POLITICS with a side of satire and first amendment.

I been thinking about some of the chatter in social media streams. The latest has been lingering with a growing realization that for some reason the democrat political machine and its affiliate leftist hydra-like apparatus vehemently does not want the orange man to be able to be voted in again as the people’s chosen elected POTUS. But, Biden won with some 80 million votes, allegedly. Still no “official” word how many of those votes really reflect registered voters still alive and cognitively functioning.

The next question is, if that voting 202o block is really legitimate like the democrat body, main stream media, big pharma, big tech and globalist donors all insist, why has there been such fierce effort by the left to squelch any voice that questions its legitimacy given the well documented, albeit censored or falsely discredited from the main stream media, clear disparities, irregularities, and protocol deviations from officials appointed to oversee votes that don’t support this assumption? I mean what significance would it be for a few outlier voices to be heard when 80 million votes presumably reflect the population’s position that could be easily proven, assuming election integrity was transparent and verifiable?

Interestingly enough prior to the 2020 election it was common narrative among the main stream media that the left side of the political playing field had no equal candidate that could match the caliber of character or acumen as the orange man. And yet they ended up selecting a mediocre career politician with a growing scandal in Ukraine and shady ties to China as their runner up. Why?

Here’s a clue. No one invests hundreds of millions of dollars into a candidate unless they’re confident they’ll get a return several times over from the risk, even if the candidate is a mediocre one. And certainly not the well connected upper crust seasoned constituents who make it their business to increase their gains through political candidates, donations, and agendas. So, if its not the candidate, and the mega donors are in, what’s left for them to hedge their bets on? The agenda.

So, a mediocre career politician, and former vice president with all the connections and in the know with mega donors, global investors and free market liberal elitists could surely have something to offer if just given the leverage. Even if from the basement of his house during the country’s fiercest political campaign season for the White House.

What did the democrat party campaign on in 2020?

https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/

What have they actually done since last year to now?

Forced public policy that does not represent the 80 million Americans who supposedly voted for the White House resident, like CRT, open borders, dismantling the energy infrastructure of the country, manufacturing intentional instability in Europe and the states, creating a food and energy shortage, de funding public law enforcement, mandating an unconstitutional and illegal experimental drug under the misleading guise of a harmless vaccination without informed consent, undermining the constitutional and civil rights of US citizens through the weaponization of quite a few federal agencies, violating the fourth amendment of the former US president (a first in US history), and promoting the normalization of infanticide and pedophilia. Just read the headlines of drag shows with young children touching private parts of the performer.

THE CURRENT RESIDENT’S INTENTIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND ANTI-AMERICAN PURSUITS since illegally capturing the white house.

Ignoring the open border crisis and trafficking illegal aliens across the country.

Instigating and funding a war in Eastern Europe with billions of American taxpayer money without any verifiable accountability where the money is actually going. Many suspect its been laundered and funneled to Biden’s Ukrainian and Chinese oligarch accomplices.

Promoting and mandating an unconstitutional experimental gene therapy treatment and calling it a vaccine for a Chinese manufactured biological weapon of mass destruction and information war.

Promoting infanticide through pro-abortion lobbying and manufacturing a baby formula shortage, overall food shortage and energy crisis across the United States.

De funding public law enforcement and intentionally creating an environment of class and race based hostility, criminality, social anarchy, open lawlessness, systemic and institutionalized mendacity, and fear-based and ego-driven indifference by public officials to the plight of millions of American citizens mostly in large urban under-resourced and over budgeted areas.

And yet, somehow the liberal establishment insists “orange man bad”, (only for the depraved left).

In closing, keep in mind, if you still believe there’s an established secular authoritative official source today distributing accurate, informed and verifiable news and information 100% of the time, or even 95% or even 80% of the time, you really haven’t been paying attention. Just saying. The world has changed and so has the lack of trust, credibility and integrity of main stream media, and news sources in general. The people are on their own.

Author: Staff Writer

A work in progress

One thought on “POLITICS with a side of satire and first amendment.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *